Performance of 3 methods for quality control for gynecologic cytology diagnoses

Acta Cytol. 2008 Jul-Aug;52(4):439-44. doi: 10.1159/000325549.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate performance and viability of internal quality control (QC) strategies in a public health laboratory of the state of São Paulo.

Study design: A retrospective study was performed with 3 QC strategies to improve internal cytologic diagnoses: morphologic guided-list criteria (MGLC), 100% rapid-rescreening (100% RR) of negative slides ("turret" method) and 10% rescreening (10% R) of negative slides. Cases were examined at Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2002 to 2004. Histopathologic results, when available, were considered gold standard; cytologic consensus diagnosis was by 2 pathologists when histologic results were unavailable.

Results: MGLC selected 20.7% samples with cytologic atypias, 10% R selected 0.6% and RR selected 2.5%. Cytologic/histologic initial concordance was 57.4%, low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion false negative rate was 34.9% and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion false negative rate was 12.2%. After diagnosis, consensus concordance was 97.2%.

Conclusion: The 100% RR and 10% R QC strategies detected more false negative cases in liquid-based cytology than in conventional Pap smears. The 100% RR strategy reduced the false negative results and allowed evaluation of individual staff performance. The 10% R strategy did not offer significant results. We concluded that association of MGLC and 100% RR strategies might improve cytologic diagnostic quality.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Brazil
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laboratories / standards*
  • Papanicolaou Test*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care*
  • Quality Control
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / pathology*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Vaginal Smears / standards*