Validity and reliability of self-monitoring indices

Brain Inj. 2008 Aug;22(9):685-90. doi: 10.1080/02699050802270014.

Abstract

Primary objective: This research concerns the measurement of self-monitoring in people who were diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI), learning disability (LD) and emotional disorder (ED). Two measures of self-monitoring were evaluated: (1) the correlation between participants' self-predicted and observed standardized sub-test scores (R) on 17 WAIS-III 1 sub-tests and (2) the average difference between the participants' predicted and observed sub-tests scores (B). It was then determined if these measures could discriminate the three diagnostic groups.

Research design: Canonical analysis assessed the relationship between the self-monitoring measures and four WAIS-III IQ measures. This study also evaluated if the R and B measures could discriminate the diagnostic groups.

Methods and procedures: One hundred and twenty-four participants, 42 with TBI, 42 with LD and 40 with ED predicted their performance on 17 WAIS-III sub-tests.

Main outcomes and results: Canonical analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between the R and B measures and four WAIS-III IQ measures. Results of a MANOVA showed that the R and B measures differed significantly among the diagnostic groups.

Conclusions: The R and B measures are two valid and reliable indices of self-monitoring that can be conveniently estimated from the WAIS-III.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Affective Symptoms / diagnosis
  • Affective Symptoms / psychology*
  • Brain Injuries / diagnosis
  • Brain Injuries / psychology*
  • Cognition / physiology*
  • Cognition Disorders / psychology*
  • Comprehension
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Learning Disabilities / diagnosis
  • Learning Disabilities / psychology*
  • Male
  • Memory
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Perception
  • Problem Solving
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Efficacy
  • Task Performance and Analysis