Addition of pioglitazone and ramipril to intensive insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients improves vascular dysfunction by different mechanisms

Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31(1):121-7. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0711. Epub 2007 Oct 1.

Abstract

Objective: We examined the relationship between glycemic control, vascular reactivity, and inflammation in type 2 diabetic subjects.

Research design and methods: Thirty subjects with type 2 diabetes were initiated on intensive insulin therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [n = 12] or multiple daily injections [n = 18]) and then randomized to either pioglitazone (PIO group;45 mg/day), ramipril (RAM group; 10 mg/day), or placebo (PLC group) for 36 weeks. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was used to quantify insulin resistance, and plethysmography was used to assess changes in forearm blood flow (FBF) after 1) 5 min of reactive hyperemia and 2) brachial artery infusion of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 microg/min) and sodium nitroprusside (3 and 10 microg/min).

Results: The decreases in A1C (approximately 9.0-7.0%) and fasting plasma glucose (approximately 190-128 mg/dl) were equal in all groups. In the PIO group, glucose disposal increased from 3.1 to 4.7 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), and there was a greater decrease in plasma triglycerides ( approximately 148 vs. 123 mg/dl) and free fatty acids (approximately 838 vs. 595 mEq/l) compared with the RAM or PLC groups (P < 0.05). Plasma adiponectin doubled with pioglitazone treatment (6.2 +/- 0.7 to 13.1 +/- 1.8 microg/ml), while endothelin-1 decreased only with ramipril treatment (2.5 +/- 0.2 to 1.1 +/- 0.2 pg/ml) (P < 001). The increase in FBF during reactive hyperemia (215%) and acetylcholine (from 132 to 205%, 216 to 262%, and 222 to 323%) was greater in the PIO versus RAM or PLC groups. In contrast, FBF during sodium nitroprusside treatment was greater in the RAM group (141-221% and 218-336%) compared with the PIO or PLC groups (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Addition of pioglitazone or ramipril to intensive insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes further improves vascular dysfunction. Pioglitazone enhances endothelial-mediated vasodilation, whereas ACE inhibition enhances endothelial-independent vasodilation. These different vascular effects, combined with the observation that pioglitazone decreases free fatty acids and triglycerides and increases adiponectin, while ramipril reduces endothelin-1, suggest that different mechanisms underlie the vascular responses.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Blood Flow Velocity / drug effects
  • Blood Glucose / drug effects
  • Blood Glucose / metabolism
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / physiopathology*
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / prevention & control*
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Forearm
  • Glucose Clamp Technique
  • Glycated Hemoglobin / metabolism
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Inflammation / prevention & control
  • Insulin / administration & dosage
  • Insulin / therapeutic use*
  • Insulin Infusion Systems
  • Pioglitazone
  • Placebos
  • Ramipril / therapeutic use*
  • Thiazolidinediones / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Blood Glucose
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Insulin
  • Placebos
  • Thiazolidinediones
  • Ramipril
  • Pioglitazone