Negative impact of rurality on lung cancer survival in a population-based study

J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Jul;2(7):613-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074bb96.

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have suggested that rurality is a risk factor for worse prognosis in cancer.

Methods: The study population included the 2268 lung cancer cases collected between 1981 and 1996 in the Doubs Cancer Registry (France).

Results: The numbers of patients were 849 (31.8%) in rural areas and 89 (3.3%) in very rural areas. The relative 5-year survival was 15.2% in rural areas and 13.4% in urban areas (p = 0.5), and 2.7% in very rural areas and 14.4% in extended urban areas (p = 0.02). Multivariate analyses of observed and relative survival showed that patients living in very rural areas (p < 0.0001), 65 years of age and older and having small cell carcinoma had a significantly shorter survival.

Conclusions: This study showed that the multidimensional definition of rurality identified a population with unfavorable prognoses.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • France / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Rural Population*
  • Survival Rate / trends