Postoperative liver dysfunction and future remnant liver: where is the limit? Results of a prospective study

World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1643-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9123-2.

Abstract

Background: The future remnant liver (FRL) limit for safe major hepatectomy with low risk of postoperative liver failure has not yet been well defined.

Methods: Between April 2000 and September 2004, every patient scheduled for major hepatectomy in our institution underwent CT-volumetry of FRL. Patients with FRL <25% underwent portal vein embolization (PVE). Exclusion criteria were PVE, associated vascular resection and liver cirrhosis. The FRL was correlated with short-term results in patients with normal liver (group A) and those with impaired liver function secondary to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or cholestasis (bilirubin >2 mg/100 ml) (group B). Liver dysfunction was defined as both PT <50% and serum bilirubin level >5 mg/100 ml for three or more consecutive days.

Results: A total of 119 patients were analyzed, 72 in group A and 47 in group B. The FRL value was the only significant risk factor for postoperative liver dysfunction in the univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). The FRL did not correlate with postoperative mortality and morbidity. Bilirubin and prothrombin time (PT) on days 3 and 7 were significantly correlated to FRL in both groups. In group A, patients with postoperative liver dysfunction had a FRL<30% (3 versus 0; p = 0.005). According to receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a FRL value of 26.5% predicted postoperative liver dysfunction with 66.7% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, 50% positive predictive value (PPV), and 98.5% negative predictive value (NPV). In group B, patients with postoperative liver dysfunction had a FRL <35% (4 versus 0; p = 0.027). According to ROC curve analysis, a FRL value of 31.05% predicted postoperative liver dysfunction with 75% sensitivity, 79.1% specificity, 25% PPV, and 97.1% NPV.

Conclusions: Hepatectomy can be considered safe when FRL is >26.5% in patients with healthy liver and >31% in patients with impaired liver function.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Embolization, Therapeutic
  • Female
  • Hepatectomy / adverse effects
  • Hepatectomy / standards*
  • Humans
  • Liver / blood supply
  • Liver / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver Function Tests
  • Liver Neoplasms / blood supply
  • Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Liver Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prothrombin Time
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional