Background: Hepatolithiasis is a prevalent disease in Southeast Asia. Hepatectomy was considered the best treatment for majority of cases. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a new procedure for liver lesions that uses a minimal invasive approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis by comparing it with open hepatectomy.
Methods: From November 2002 to March 2006 a total of 30 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Twenty-nine were included in this study (a converted case was excluded) and called the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (LH). During the same period 22 patients with hepatolithiasis who met the inclusion criteria for laparoscopic hepatectomy were selected for open hepatectomy and called the open group (OH). All operations were performed by the authors. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups. Data were statistically compared.
Results: Compared with open hepatectomy, those who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy had a shorter postoperative hospital stay and fasting time, a lower postoperative serum aminotransferase level, and a higher postoperative serum albumin level. Stone clearance rate (intermediate rate, 89.7% vs. 86.4%; final rate, 100% vs. 96.5%), stone recurrence rate (0% vs. 4.5%), operating time, and intraoperative blood loss were similar for the two groups. Six complications occurred, two (6.8%) in LH and four (18.2%) in OH. There was no perioperative mortality in either group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis is feasible and safe in selected patients.