Assessment of middle ear disease in the dog: a comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities

J Small Anim Pract. 2007 Apr;48(4):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00295.x.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare radiography and ultrasound for the assessment of the tympanic bulla against computed tomography results.

Methods: Thirty-one dogs had dorsoventral, left and right lateral oblique and rostrocaudal open mouth radiographs compared with ultrasound images and computed tomography scans of the tympanic bullae.

Results: Radiography was superior to ultrasonography for the evaluation of the middle ear. However, computed tomography assessment was best predicted by a combination of radiographic and ultrasonographic findings.

Clinical significance: A combination of radiography and ultrasound can provide a more accurate assessment of the bulla than either of them alone. Ultrasound may have a role in the evaluation of middle ear disease in the dog. Results are operator dependent and not reproducible with current recording techniques.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Dog Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Dog Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Dogs
  • Ear Diseases / diagnosis
  • Ear Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Ear Diseases / veterinary*
  • Ear, Middle / diagnostic imaging*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary
  • Ultrasonography