Abstract
This manuscript assesses the risks, benefits, and ethical concerns regarding the use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) to create a new donor for stem cell transplantation. We address ethical literature, the medical and psychosocial impact on patient, donor, family, and medical caregivers, and the appropriate decision-making process. We conclude that the use of ART to create a stem cell donor can be ethically acceptable. The decision to conceive a donor has medical and psychosocial implications. The family is the appropriate decision-maker and must consider risks and benefits to all parties with input from medical caregivers.
(c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
MeSH terms
-
Abortion, Eugenic / ethics
-
Adult
-
Child, Unwanted / psychology
-
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation / psychology
-
Decision Making*
-
Embryo Disposition / ethics
-
Embryo Transfer / ethics
-
Family Health
-
Family Planning Services / ethics*
-
Female
-
Fertilization in Vitro / ethics
-
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / psychology
-
Human Rights
-
Humans
-
Infant, Newborn
-
Male
-
Mothers / psychology
-
Parenting / psychology
-
Parents / psychology*
-
Patient Care Team
-
Physician's Role
-
Preimplantation Diagnosis / ethics
-
Psychology, Child
-
Risk
-
Risk Assessment
-
Siblings* / psychology
-
Third-Party Consent / ethics
-
Tissue Donors / ethics*
-
Tissue Donors / psychology
-
Tissue Donors / supply & distribution
-
Tissue and Organ Procurement / ethics*
-
Tissue and Organ Procurement / methods