Having a child to save a sibling: reassessing risks and benefits of creating stem cell donors

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Mar;48(3):249-53. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20990.

Abstract

This manuscript assesses the risks, benefits, and ethical concerns regarding the use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) to create a new donor for stem cell transplantation. We address ethical literature, the medical and psychosocial impact on patient, donor, family, and medical caregivers, and the appropriate decision-making process. We conclude that the use of ART to create a stem cell donor can be ethically acceptable. The decision to conceive a donor has medical and psychosocial implications. The family is the appropriate decision-maker and must consider risks and benefits to all parties with input from medical caregivers.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Eugenic / ethics
  • Adult
  • Child, Unwanted / psychology
  • Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation / psychology
  • Decision Making*
  • Embryo Disposition / ethics
  • Embryo Transfer / ethics
  • Family Health
  • Family Planning Services / ethics*
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro / ethics
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / psychology
  • Human Rights
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Mothers / psychology
  • Parenting / psychology
  • Parents / psychology*
  • Patient Care Team
  • Physician's Role
  • Preimplantation Diagnosis / ethics
  • Psychology, Child
  • Risk
  • Risk Assessment
  • Siblings* / psychology
  • Third-Party Consent / ethics
  • Tissue Donors / ethics*
  • Tissue Donors / psychology
  • Tissue Donors / supply & distribution
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement / ethics*
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement / methods