Iron supplementation: oral tablets versus intramuscular injection

Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Apr;16(2):180-6. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.16.2.180.

Abstract

Non-anemic, iron depleted women were randomly assigned to an injection group (IG) or oral group (OG) to assess which method is more efficient for increasing iron stores over a short time period. IG received a course of 5 x 2 mL intramuscular injections over 10 d, and OG received one tablet daily for 30 d. Fourteen, 21 and 28 d after commencing supplementation, ferritin concentration in OG significantly increased from baseline (means +/- standard error: 27 +/- 3 to 40 +/- 5 to 41 +/- 5 to 41 +/- 5 microg/L; P < 0.01). Similarly, on days 15, 20, and 28 post the first injection, ferritin concentration in IG significantly increased from baseline (means +/- standard error: 20 +/- 2 to 71 +/- 17 to 63 +/- 11 to 63 +/- 7 microg/L; P < 0.01), and was also significantly greater than OG at day 15 and 28 (P < 0.05). Iron injections are significantly more effective (both in time and degree of increase) in improving ferritin levels over 30 d than oral tablets.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Female
  • Ferritins / analysis*
  • Hemoglobins / analysis*
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intramuscular / methods
  • Iron / blood
  • Iron Deficiencies*
  • Iron, Dietary / administration & dosage
  • Iron, Dietary / pharmacokinetics*
  • Iron, Dietary / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hemoglobins
  • Iron, Dietary
  • Ferritins
  • Iron