Reproductive performance in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis: is surgery worthwhile?

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.068. Epub 2006 May 16.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the incidence of pregnancy is increased and time-to-conception is reduced in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis undergoing conservative surgery compared with those on expectant management.

Study design: A total of 105 infertile women under the age of 40 years with rectovaginal endometriosis and no other associated major infertility factor underwent first-line conservative surgery at laparotomy or expectant management according to a shared decision-making approach.

Results: Among the 44 women who had resection of rectovaginal endometriosis, 15 became pregnant, compared with 22 of the 61 women who choose expectant management (24-month cumulative probabilities, 44.9% and 46.8%, respectively; log-rank test, chi2(1) = 0.75; P = .38). One major and 9 minor postoperative complications occurred. Significant differences in pain-free survival time in favor of the surgery group were observed for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.

Conclusion: Conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis in infertile women does not modify the reproductive prognosis although it does increase pain-free survival time.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Endometriosis / complications
  • Endometriosis / surgery*
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures*
  • Humans
  • Infertility, Female / complications
  • Infertility, Female / physiopathology*
  • Palliative Care
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Rectal Diseases / complications
  • Rectal Diseases / surgery*
  • Reproduction*
  • Survival Analysis
  • Vaginal Diseases / complications
  • Vaginal Diseases / surgery*