Multiple-image in-room CT imaging guidance for interventional procedures

Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):863-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050446. Epub 2006 Apr 18.

Abstract

This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare room use time for interventional procedures performed with multiple-image multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy (n=196) and single-image spiral CT fluoroscopy (n=175). There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, or procedural type between the two groups. The median room use time was 90 minutes (interquartile range, 65-120 minutes) for the single-image technique and 75 minutes (interquartile range, 60-105 minutes) for the multiple-image technique. A two-sample t test with equal variance assumption on the log-transformed data showed a statistically significant difference in log time (P<.001) between the two groups. This time savings could potentially have a substantial clinical effect on resource use and patient throughput.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy
  • Catheter Ablation
  • Drainage
  • Efficiency, Organizational
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy / methods
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paracentesis
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiography, Interventional / methods*
  • Radiology Department, Hospital / organization & administration*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sex Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, Spiral Computed / methods
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*