Follow-up on diagnostic proficiency of laboratories equipped to perform orthopoxvirus detection and quantification by PCR: the second international external quality assurance study

J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Apr;44(4):1283-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1283-1287.2006.

Abstract

Two years after the first external quality assurance study on bioterrorism-relevant viruses, we have conducted a follow-up study on orthopoxvirus detection by PCR. Thirty-three laboratories (27 European, 4 Austral-Asian, and 2 American) participated. Samples contained 0 to 40,000,000 DNA copies of lyophilized monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia virus per ml. Laboratories achieved a >80% detection chance above 56,234 copies per ml. Global sensitivity was not significantly improved over that of the first study. Twenty-seven and 9 participants, respectively, were able to genotype and quantify virus. Four of 27 genotyping results were incorrect. Quantification accuracy was significantly better for vaccinia virus than for the other viruses. False-positive results occurred in 22 (11.8%) of all 186 tests on negative samples, but 18 of these were contributed by only five laboratories. Fifty-five percent of laboratories could appropriately detect PCR inhibition. The use of either real-time PCR or commercial diagnostic kits had significant positive influence on laboratory performance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques
  • DNA, Viral / blood
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • International Cooperation*
  • Laboratories / standards*
  • Orthopoxvirus / genetics
  • Orthopoxvirus / isolation & purification*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*
  • Poxviridae Infections / virology
  • Quality Control
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / standards*

Substances

  • DNA, Viral
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic