Teaching basic life support to nurses

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Apr;23(4):327-31. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000032. Epub 2006 Jan 27.

Abstract

Background and objective: Every member of healthcare personnel should be able to perform basic life support including defibrillation (CPR-D). The biggest cost of implementation is training and these costs need to be reduced. The purpose of this randomized study was to evaluate the applicability of distance learning as a method to teach CPR-D.

Methods: Nurses (n = 56) working in a geriatric hospital were randomized into three groups. The first group was given the Internet-based CPR-D course and the second was given a traditional, small-group CPR-D course. A third group without specific training in CPR-D served as a control group. An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was performed 2 weeks after the courses with a manikin patient having a cardiac arrest.

Results: The median score of all participants was 31/49 (range 21-38). The reliability of the checklist was adequate (Cronbach alpha 0.77). Nurses receiving traditional CPR-D performed better than those receiving the Internet-based course (median score 34 vs. 28, P < 0.05) and the control group (median score 34 vs. 26, P < 0.0001). Nurses receiving Internet-based course performed similarly as the control group (median score 28 vs. 26, ns).

Conclusions: Distance learning cannot substitute for traditional small-group learning.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Education, Distance / methods*
  • Education, Nursing / methods*
  • Humans
  • Internet*
  • Life Support Care / methods*
  • Teaching / methods