[Reinterventions for arterial reconstruction in anastomotic aneurysm]

Minerva Chir. 1992 May 15;47(9):815-22.
[Article in Italian]

Abstract

We reviewed our experience on the surgical treatment of anastomotic false aneurysms from 1979 through 1990: two groups of patients were identified. Group 1 (31 patients) included patients who had been previously operated on at our Institute and then routinely followed-up with physical examination and ultrasonographic studies. The incidence of anastomotic aneurysm in this group was 4.03%; the interval between insertion of the prosthesis and detection of the false aneurysm varied from 5 to 144 months, with a median interval of 58 month. The surgical treatment of choice (false aneurysm resection and graft interposition) has been successfully performed (97% of cases) without mortality. Group 2 (8 patients) included patients with complications of false aneurysm (emergency operations); in this group radical treatment was not always applicable; mortality and amputations rate were significantly increased (respectively 25% and 37%). We conclude that, after prosthetic reconstructions, only a careful long-term follow-up (also with use of ultrasonic and/or CT-scan studies) may allow reduction in morbidity and improvement in late survival.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / adverse effects*
  • Aneurysm / etiology
  • Aneurysm / surgery*
  • Aortic Aneurysm / etiology
  • Aortic Aneurysm / surgery*
  • Emergencies
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery / surgery*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Iliac Artery / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reoperation