Pharmacokinetic comparison of two recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after subcutaneous administration in rabbits

Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005 Oct;61(3):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2005.06.003. Epub 2005 Aug 29.

Abstract

A pharmacokinetic comparison between two formulations (LeukoCIM, CIMAB SA versus Neupogen, Hoffman-La Roche, licensed by Amgen) of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) using non-compartmental analysis was performed in male F1 rabbits after a single subcutaneous 11.5 microg/kg dose to help decide whether to conduct further comparability tests. Unlike the absorption phase, a statistical difference was not detected between Neupogen and LeukoCIM for clearance (18.69+/-11.83 versus 28.42+/-12.11 mL/h/kg, P=0.22). In addition, using a multivariate statistical analysis by independent samples test, a significant difference was not found between the two formulations (P=0.88). Finally, the results obtained in this study confirmed the pharmacokinetic comparability between both formulations, supporting the claim for further assessments following the current protocol on biogeneric equivalence.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Area Under Curve
  • Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / administration & dosage
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / pharmacokinetics*
  • Humans
  • Injections, Subcutaneous
  • Male
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Rabbits
  • Recombinant Proteins

Substances

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor