[DRG and OPS-301: effects on the acquisition performance in radiology]

Radiologe. 2005 Aug;45(8):698-703. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1226-x.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Reimbursement for inpatient services rendered based on comparable daily care rates, case-based flat rates, and special fees as practiced until now has been replaced by the system of diagnosis-related groups. Up until 2004, operation and procedure system (OPS 301) codes could be processed completely automatically by appropriate adaptation of the radiology information system (RIS). Because of further differentiation of OPS codes in the 2005 version, it is no longer possible to unambiguously determine OPS codes automatically. Our goal was to fulfill these additional requirements with as little extra effort as possible. In 36 of 2138 procedures during an observation period of 12 days, i.e., 4/day, manual input on the part of the radiology technical assistant and quality assurance by the diagnosing physician were necessary. This is only needed in complicated procedures for which the minor added effort is negligible in comparison to the entire effort expended for the procedure. We were thus able to achieve the goal of near automation of ascertaining OPS codes.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Databases, Factual
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / economics*
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / statistics & numerical data
  • Diagnosis-Related Groups / economics*
  • Diagnosis-Related Groups / standards*
  • Germany
  • Information Storage and Retrieval / economics
  • Information Storage and Retrieval / methods
  • Information Storage and Retrieval / statistics & numerical data*
  • Medical Records Systems, Computerized / statistics & numerical data*
  • Radiology / economics*
  • Radiology / standards
  • Radiology / statistics & numerical data*
  • Radiology Information Systems / economics
  • Radiology Information Systems / statistics & numerical data*