Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy

Heart Rhythm. 2005 Jan;2(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.10.028.

Abstract

Objectives: We studied the effect of varying shock capacitance, shock impedance, and pulse duration on defibrillation efficacy in a randomized, crossover manner for biphasic shocks.

Background: The relationship between the electrical determinants of defibrillation efficacy is incompletely understood.

Methods: Biphasic shocks were delivered to 12 dogs through epicardial patches (to vary impedance) after 15 seconds of ventricular fibrillation using one of 100- or 155-muF capacitors at each of four pulse durations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 ms), in a balanced random order. There were two impedance groups: six with higher impedance (mean 97 +/- 15 Omega, range 80-120) and six with lower impedance (mean 39 +/- 3 Omega, range 34-44). Voltage requirements were estimated as the average of three defibrillation threshold (DFT) tests.

Results: Shock capacitance, resistance, and pulse duration all had significant effects upon the minimum voltage DFT (P = .0065, P = .0066, and P = .0001, respectively). The tilt associated with the lowest voltage and current requirement for each of the four capacitance/resistance combinations varied widely, between 34 +/- 5% and 63 +/- 3%, depending on capacitance and impedance. The optimal pulse duration associated with minimum DFT lies between 5.11 and 5.34 ms.

Conclusions: Defibrillation voltage requirements for biphasic shocks are affected by pulse duration, capacitance and impedance, but not "tilt."

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dogs
  • Electric Capacitance
  • Electric Countershock*
  • Electric Impedance
  • Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
  • Heart Conduction System / physiology
  • Random Allocation
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy*