The authors tested whether a simple model based on the cancellation of the rate of change in bearing angle could account for the behavioral adaptations produced when individuals intercept moving balls while walking. In Experiment 1, the place of arrival of the ball and the angle of approach were varied. In accord with the model, velocity regulations were earlier and more pronounced the larger the angle of approach. In Experiment 2, ball speed unexpectedly changed during a trial, once again highlighting participants' functional velocity adaptations. A direct test of the model on the basis of each individual trial (N = 256) revealed that, on average, 70% of the total variance could be explained. Together, those results confirm the usefulness of such a robust strategy in the control of interceptive tasks.