Purpose: To date, there is a consensus to consider colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis as the standard form of reconstruction after proctectomy for cancer. However, one drawback of colonic J-pouch is evacuation difficulties, which are observed at some degree in almost one-half of patients. To improve functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis, we describe a new technique of isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch.
Methods: The functional results after construction of this pouch were assessed prospectively in ten patients and compared with those obtained in a control group of matched patients with a colonic J-pouch.
Results: At six months and one year, there were no differences between both pouches for bowel function, continence score, and evacuation difficulties.
Conclusions: This preliminary study showed that the creation of a new isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch did not improve the functional results after coloanal anastomosis compared with colonic J-pouch. Because colonic H-pouch is technically more complex to fashion, it should not be performed routinely and the J-pouch remains the benchmark for routine clinical practice.