Basal ganglia haematomas in non-comatose patients: subacute stereotactic aspiration improves long-term outcome in comparison to purely medical treatment

Neurosurg Rev. 2005 Jan;28(1):64-9. doi: 10.1007/s10143-004-0355-4. Epub 2004 Sep 29.

Abstract

This study examined whether subacute stereotactic evacuation of basal ganglia haematomas in primarily non-comatose patients is suitable to improve the ultimate outcome of this subgroup of stroke patients. Applying rigorous selection criteria, 56 consecutive non-comatose patients with ganglionic haematomas were treated stereotactically, and 1-year outcomes employing four outcome parameters commonly used to assess outcome were compared with those of 39 similar patients who were treated purely medically. No survival benefit was found in long-term follow-up for either surgical or conservative treatment (total mortality 16.1% vs 28.2%; P=0.121). Among survivors, however, outcome was significantly better in surgical patients. Compared with medical patients, the median Glasgow Outcome Scale score was 1 point higher (P<0.0001) in surgical patients, and the median European Stroke Scale score improvement from baseline to 1-year score was significantly better (P<0.0001). Accordingly, the median Barthel Index score was significantly higher (P=0.002), and the median Modified Rankin Scale score was 1 point lower (P<0.0001). We conclude that primarily non-comatose patients with basal ganglia haematomas can ultimately profit from this form of minimally invasive treatment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage / drug therapy*
  • Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage / mortality
  • Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glasgow Outcome Scale
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stereotaxic Techniques*
  • Suction*
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome