Compliance in pain rehabilitation: patient and provider perspectives

Pain Med. 2004 Mar;5(1):66-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04002.x.

Abstract

Objective: To identify potential predictors and correlates of compliance and to examine differences between patient and provider perspectives on compliance.

Patients: One hundred eighty-four patients (84 men and 96 women) were recruited from a chronic pain treatment program for this telephone follow-up study.

Results: Health care providers (HCPs) reported making more recommendations than patients reported hearing. Patients rated themselves as more compliant than did HCPs. Overall compliance rates at a >6-month follow-up were 89% from the patients' perspective and 70% from the HCPs' perspective. HCPs rated compliance specific to psychological care as more related to positive outcomes than did patients. Participants' pain and anxiety ratings at a >6-month follow-up and satisfaction with treatment were significantly associated with patients' compliance ratings. For HCP-rated compliance, only HCPs' perceived benefit and interference from compliance were associated.

Conclusion: Results suggest important disparities between HCPs and patients on remembered recommendations, levels of compliance, and health-related importance of complying with recommendations.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Personnel* / psychology
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain / drug therapy
  • Pain / epidemiology*
  • Pain / rehabilitation*
  • Pain Measurement / psychology
  • Patient Compliance* / psychology
  • Regression Analysis
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Analgesics