In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth

Caries Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):437-41. doi: 10.1159/000073396.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Fifty sites from 30 molars in 29 patients were selected and evaluated under standardized conditions by 2 previously trained examiners according to the 3 diagnostic methods. Histological examination served as gold standard after exfoliation or extraction. Values obtained for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.60, 0.90 and 0.73 for laser fluorescence, 0.82, 0.85 and 0.84 for visual inspection and 0.62, 0.73 and 0.67 for radiography, respectively. Considering only dentinal caries, values were 0.73, 0.95 and 0.90 for laser fluorescence, 0.61, 1.00 and 0.90 for visual inspection and 0.96, 0.81 and 0.85 for radiography, respectively. We conclude that for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars laser fluorescence presents a similar accuracy when compared to visual inspection and radiography, although visual inspection showed better values for sensitivities for both enamel and dentin lesions.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Dental Caries / diagnosis*
  • Dental Caries / diagnostic imaging
  • Dental Caries / pathology
  • Dental Enamel / diagnostic imaging
  • Dental Enamel / pathology
  • Dentin / diagnostic imaging
  • Dentin / pathology
  • Fluorescence
  • Humans
  • Lasers*
  • Molar / diagnostic imaging
  • Molar / pathology
  • Observer Variation
  • Photography, Dental
  • Radiography, Bitewing
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tooth Demineralization / diagnosis
  • Tooth Demineralization / diagnostic imaging
  • Tooth Demineralization / pathology
  • Tooth, Deciduous / diagnostic imaging
  • Tooth, Deciduous / pathology*