Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation. Technical and safety aspects

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Oct 10;110(2):220-3. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00160-x.

Abstract

Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects.

Study design: A randomised controlled study in a teaching hospital, 139 pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding proved by a validated menstrual score list were enclosed. Endometrial ablation by a hysteroscopic or non-hysteroscopic method was performed.

Results: Rollerball electrocoagulation carries a significantly higher risk of intra-operative complications compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation and is a significantly more time consuming procedure. Post-operative complication rates in both groups were low, but post-operative analgesics were prescribed significantly more in the uterine balloon group.

Conclusion: Endometrial ablation by uterine balloon thermal ablation (Thermachoice) is a safe and simple non-hysteroscopic procedure.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Catheterization*
  • Electrocoagulation / methods*
  • Endometrium / surgery*
  • Female
  • Hot Temperature / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Intraoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Menorrhagia / surgery*
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Premenopause
  • Time Factors