Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity?

Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):161-86. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127166.

Abstract

In five studies we explored how the context in which people think about the social structure and the implications of the social structure for one's in-group affect attitudes toward inequality. In Studies 1 and 2 we found that social dominance orientation (SDO) scores reflect attitudes toward specific types of inequality that are salient in context. Consistent with social identity theory, in Studies 3 to 5 we found that SDO scores reflected the interests of specific group identities. Indeed, when we compared existing privileged and disadvantaged groups, and when we manipulated in-group status, we found that participants held more positive attitudes toward inequality when the in-group was privileged, compared to when the in-group was disadvantaged. Across all of our studies, results were consistent with the contention that attitudes toward inequality are group-specific and depend on the social-structural position of salient in-groups. We discuss the implications of our findings for social dominance theory.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attitude*
  • Female
  • Group Processes*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prejudice*
  • Sex Factors
  • Social Dominance*
  • Social Identification*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires