The exact staging of prostate cancer is mandatory to allow selection of the appropriate primary therapy. In addition, if the PSA level rises again it is extremely important to find the site(s) of local recurrence or metastatic spread as soon as possible. However, with the morphological and metabolic imaging techniques currently available it is often not possible to answer these questions with adequate sensitivity and specificity, since small metastases < or = 1 cm in diameter are likely to remain undetected by them. In the last few years new radioactive labelled tracers have been introduced for use in positron emission tomography (PET), and it is hoped that the shortcomings in the diagnostic procedures used for prostate carcinoma might be compensated by their use. Besides 11C- or 18F-labelled choline, [11C]Acetate is also attracting attention as a promising PET tracer. In this paper we review the various PET tracers available and evaluate the advantages and the drawbacks of [11C]Acetate in three case studies by comparing [11C]Acetate-PET with histology and with other imaging techniques. The use of [11C]Acetate appears to be feasible and helpful in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. However, its final value relative to other imaging techniques needs further investigation, with special reference to initial lymph node involvement, early localisation of recurrence and possible noninvasive differentiation between prostate cancer, prostatis and benign hyperplasia of the prostate.