Abstract
A study was performed on critically ill patients to evaluate the rate of colonization and catheter-related sepsis using antiseptic bonded (Arrowguard Arrow International) versus smooth pure polymer (Infectguard MedexMedical Ltd) central venous catheters. Two hundred and thirty-two catheters were inserted into 181 patients. Indications for removal included local or systemic infection, the catheter was no longer required and patient death. No statistical difference in colonization rate was found between the two types of catheter.
Copyright 2002 The Hospital Infection Society
Publication types
-
Clinical Trial
-
Comparative Study
-
Controlled Clinical Trial
MeSH terms
-
Anti-Infective Agents, Local / standards*
-
Bacteria / growth & development*
-
Catheterization, Central Venous / instrumentation*
-
Catheters, Indwelling / microbiology*
-
Catheters, Indwelling / standards*
-
Coated Materials, Biocompatible / standards*
-
Colony Count, Microbial
-
Critical Illness / therapy*
-
Equipment Contamination / prevention & control*
-
Humans
-
Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
-
Middle Aged
-
Polymers / standards*
-
Risk Factors
-
Time Factors
Substances
-
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
-
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
-
Polymers