Bilateral cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):434-40. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31073.

Abstract

A subjective, clinical, and radiographic comparison was made between 140 primary cemented and cementless femoral components in 70 patients <50 years old who underwent bilateral simultaneous total hip arthroplasty. The average duration of follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 7-9 years). Hip scores were similar in both groups at the final follow-up. The prevalence of transitory thigh pain was 17% in the cementless group and 3% in the cemented group. No hip had subsidence or aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral components in either group. One cemented hip was revised for late infection, and 1 cementless hip was revised for recurrent dislocation. There was no difference in the incidence of osteolysis in the femur (9% in the cemented hip vs 13% in the cementless hip) and acetabulum (9% each) between the groups.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
  • Cementation
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Radiography
  • Time Factors