[Trueness of modern natural science (1): the scientific revolution and the problem of philosophy]

J UOEH. 2001 Dec 1;23(4):369-80. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.23.369.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

How can one characterize modern Europe? This problem is essentially related to the meaning of modern natural science, which was developed during the scientific revolution. Then how did viewpoints change during this revolution? The answer to this question also determined the basic character of modern philosophy. Through the examination of Aristotle's geocentric theory and kinematics, I have come to believe that the defect of Aristotle's was that he concluded that a visible sense image is an actual reflection of the reality as it is. From this point of view, the traditional theory of truth called "correspondence theory" is found to be an insufficient one. Therefore, in this paper I will show that the methodological and philosophical question "How do we see reality among phenomena?" is a very important one. This question is the one Plato struggled with, and also the one which guided Kant. It may be said that this can be seen as a group for a new metaphysics as a basic theory of reality.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Historical Article
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • History, 16th Century
  • History, 17th Century
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Metaphysics / history
  • Natural Science Disciplines* / history
  • Philosophy* / history