Peritoneal closure--to close or not to close

Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1548-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1548.

Abstract

Peritoneal closure is a controversial issue among obstetricians and gynaecologists. This article reappraises the issue of peritoneal closure. We conducted a thorough literature search using Medline, Pubmed and Embase as well as a hand-search for all references quoted in the relevant papers. The routine non-closure of the peritoneum reduces operation time by an average of 6 min. Most studies showed no difference in the other outcome measures including infection/febrile episodes, analgesic/anaesthetics requirement, bowel function restoration, post-operative stay and adhesion formation. There are insufficient data concerning adhesion formation. In conclusion, apart from a slightly shorter operation time associated with non-closure of the peritoneum, many studies showed no difference in short-term morbidity in the closure and the non-closure group. More studies are needed to examine the long-term morbidity associated with the closure or the non-closure of the peritoneum.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Analgesia
  • Anesthesia
  • Female
  • Fever / epidemiology
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Humans
  • Infections / epidemiology
  • Intestines / physiology
  • Obstetric Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Peritoneum / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue Adhesions / epidemiology