Objectives: On the basis of previous reports of an attentional bias for threat-related emotional material in deluded schizophrenics (e.g. Bentall & Kaney, 1989), the present study examined the proposal that a similar bias would be demonstrated by delusion-prone individuals, reflected by longer response latencies for the task of processing threat-related facially displayed affects (e.g. anger, fear).
Design: A non-randomized matched group design was employed to examine the performance of delusion-prone individuals in comparison with a control group.
Methods: 50 psychiatrically healthy participants completed the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI) as an index of delusional ideation (Peters, Day, & Garety, 1996; Peters, Joseph, & Garety, 1999). Subjects were presented with a standard set of facial stimuli depicting happy, sad, neutral, fearful and angry emotion expressions (Mazurski & Bond, 1993). Reaction times for the task of identifying each type of affect were compared between groups of high and low scorers on the PDI.
Results: Highly delusion-prone individuals displayed a significant delay in processing angry facial expressions in comparison with low scorers on the PDI.
Conclusions: The increased response latency for processing angry expressions was interpreted as evidence of attentional bias for material posing a threat to the self, supporting previous cognitive data in relation to deluded patients. Threatening facial expressions may be regarded with increased significance by delusion-prone individuals, and it is possible that this bias is involved in the formation of delusional beliefs.