Contemporary "urologic" intervention in the pancreaticobiliary tree

Urology. 2001 Jan;57(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00888-8.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the role of minimally invasive "urologic" interventional techniques for the treatment of pancreaticobiliary calculi in contemporary practice.

Methods: Fourteen patients with retained cystic duct (n = 2), hepatic duct (n = 5), common duct (n = 2), pancreatic duct (n = 4), or gallbladder (n = 1) calculi were treated with 19 procedures, including shock wave lithotripsy (n = 9) and percutaneous flexible endoscopy with electrohydraulic or holmium laser lithotripsy (n = 10). Previous attempts using standard gastroenterologic or radiologic interventions before the urologic referral had failed in all 14 patients.

Results: A successful result, defined by the resolution of stones and symptoms, was achieved in 12 patients (86%); 2 patients (14%) had residual calculi that ultimately required an open operative procedure. The hospital stay for each intervention was 0 to 2 nights, and no patients had any significant complications.

Conclusions: Even in this age of advanced gastroenterologic technology, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatoscopy, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, the urologist can play a significant role in the minimally invasive treatment of patients with complicated biliary disease such that the need for open operative "salvage" procedures will be further minimized.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bile Duct Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Bile Duct Diseases / therapy
  • Calculi / diagnostic imaging
  • Calculi / therapy*
  • Cholangiography / methods
  • Cholelithiasis / diagnostic imaging
  • Cholelithiasis / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Lithotripsy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatic Ducts* / diagnostic imaging
  • Ureteroscopes*