Does the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome differ from nonbacterial prostatitis and prostatodynia?

J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1554-8.

Abstract

Purpose: The new consensus classification considers the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) based on presence or absence of leukocytes in the expressed prostatic secretions, post-massage urine or seminal fluid analysis. We compared classification based on evaluation of these 3 specimens to the traditional classification based on expressed prostatic secretion examination alone.

Materials and methods: A prospective clinical and laboratory protocol was used to evaluate symptomatic patients who had no evidence of urethritis, acute bacterial prostatitis or chronic bacterial prostatitis.

Results: Thorough clinical and microbiological evaluation of 310 patients attending our prostatitis clinic was used to select a population of 140 subjects who provided optimal expressed prostatic secretion, post-massage urine and semen specimens. Inflammation was documented in 111 (26%) of 420 samples, including 39 expressed prostatic secretion samples with 500 or greater leukocytes/mm.3, 32 post-massage urine samples with 1 or greater leukocytes/mm.3 and 40 seminal fluid specimens with 1 or greater million leukocytes/mm.3. Of the 140 subjects 73 (52%) had inflammatory chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain according to the consensus criteria but only 39 (28%) had nonbacterial prostatitis according to traditional expressed prostatic secretion criteria (p <0.001).

Conclusions: The new consensus concept of inflammatory chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain includes almost twice as many patients as the traditional category of nonbacterial prostatitis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Body Fluids
  • Chronic Disease
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvic Pain / diagnosis*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostatitis / diagnosis*
  • Prostatitis / microbiology
  • Semen / chemistry
  • Syndrome