Over the past 30 years, there has been considerable controversy regarding the role of segmental and wedge resections in the management of stage I (T1-T2N0M0) non-small-cell lung cancer. Recently, a prospective randomized trial (Lung Cancer Study Group, 1995) revealed unfavorable results after limited resection, which, in early stage lung cancer, remains a reasonable option for patients with compromised pulmonary reserve, especially those in whom a previous contralateral resection has been performed. The following report describes the role of limited resection in the management of patients with T1-T2N0 non-small-cell lung cancer and presents a retrospective review of our series of 125 limited resections out of 1356 resections performed for lung cancer. In particular, long term survival and the frequency of local/regional recurrence were noted in 92 cases operated on with a curative intent. 26.6% vs 12.5% local/regional recurrence rates were observed among patients undergoing limited resections for T2 and T1 lung cancer, respectively. The five year survival in the limited resection group was 13.5% for T1 and 60% for T2 vs 51% and 72% in the standard procedure group, respectively. The lobectomy results were superior to those of sublobar resection. The latter should be reserved for patients in poor general condition contraindicating a standard lobectomy.