Tumor size does not have prognostic significance in stage Ia NSCLC

Anticancer Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;20(2B):1155-8.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with lesions 2 cm or less in diameter, was better than that of Stage Ia lung cancer having a diameter of more than 2 cm.

Methods: We reviewed 64 cases of NSCLC which were preoperatively diagnosed as TINOMO. The tumors were classified into 2 groups on the basis of a tumor diameter set at 2 cm. After comparison of background factors, we compared the prognoses of the groups and determined the prognostic factors in Stage IA NSCLC.

Results: No differences were observed in the survival rate between the 2 groups. Statistically significant factors for the survival period in Stage IA NSCLC were serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), residual tumor condition and lymph node metastasis. Those cases where CEA was abnormal were all in Stage II or inllmore advanced stage.

Conclusion: It is not justifiable to sub-classify Stage IA NSCLC on the basis of a tumor diameter of 2 cm. The present study revealed that the most important preoperative prognostic factor was serum CEA.

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / mortality
  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology
  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen / analysis
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / pathology*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / surgery
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / mortality
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasm, Residual
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Smoking
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen