Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000 Feb;15(1):739-49. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200002000-00012.

Abstract

Objective: To assess reliability between persons with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and their self-selected proxies.

Design: Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were used to assess participant-proxy reliability on the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

Setting: Participants had been discharged to the community from inpatient rehabilitation between six months and approximately five years prior to the study's beginning.

Participants: 204 persons with moderate to severe TBI and their self-selected proxies.

Results: Eighty-seven percent of the items on the three instruments exhibited moderate to high intraclass correlation (ICC), with strongest participant-proxy agreement for questions assessing concrete, observable information. Participant-proxy agreement was poorest when assessing cognitive and money management capacity as well as out-of-home activities.

Conclusions: For many types of items, participant-proxy reliability is sufficient to merit the use of proxies in TBI outcome research when the participants are allowed to select their own proxy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Brain Injuries / complications
  • Brain Injuries / diagnosis
  • Brain Injuries / rehabilitation*
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis
  • Cognition Disorders / etiology
  • Cognition Disorders / rehabilitation*
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Proxy*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • Treatment Outcome