[Experimental study on intraperitoneal and intravenous administration of anti-tumor agents for liver metastasis]

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1999 Oct;26(12):1782-5.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been the treatment for peritoneal seedings. Most of the anti-tumor agent administered intraperitoneally is absorbed from visceral peritoneum, gets into the portal vein system and reaches the liver. Theoretically, intraperitoneal administration of anti-tumor agents must show equivalent effects on the liver metastasis to portal vein infusion. We compared the efficacy of intraperitoneal and intravenous administration of 5-FU, CDDP and CPT-11, using colon 26 mouse liver metastasis model. Intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU or CPT-11 was statistically superior to intravenous administration to diminish the liver metastatic deposits. CDDP experiment did not show a statistical difference, but the superiority intraperitoneal administration was recognized. Intraperitoneal administration of anti-tumor agents is more effective for not only peritoneal seedings but also liver metastases than intravenous administration. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy might be an effective adjuvant chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Camptothecin / administration & dosage
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives
  • Cisplatin / administration & dosage
  • Colonic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Fluorouracil / administration & dosage
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Infusions, Parenteral
  • Irinotecan
  • Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Mice
  • Mice, Inbred BALB C
  • Tumor Cells, Cultured

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Irinotecan
  • Cisplatin
  • Fluorouracil
  • Camptothecin