Classical excision of saphenous vein grafts requires a continuous incision on the leg or the thigh or both. To minimise the trauma due to this method, an endoscopic method has been recently developed. The aim of this paper was to assess the benefits of this new method compared with the classical technique. One hundred and twenty patients requiring aorto-coronary grafts were included in this prospective study and divided into two groups according to the method of saphenous vein harvesting. Group A comprised 60 patients who underwent the classical method os saphenous vein harvesting and Group B 60 patients who benefited from the endoscopic method. No difference was observed between the two groups with respect to mean age, sex ratio, history of diabetes and obliterative arterial disease of the lower limbs. Parsonnet index number of bypass grafts and length of vein excised. The length of the skin wound in group A was 30.8 +/- 8.5 cm compared with only 4.1 +/- 1 cm in Group B (p = 0.006) but the harvesting time was longer by endoscopy (55.7 +/- 23.7 minutes: 72.5 +/- 22.6 minutes for the first 10 patients, 48.5 +/- 24.7 minutes for the last 50 patients) compared with the classical technique (39.8 +/- 6.6 minutes: p = 0.001). Moreover, patients who underwent videosurgery had less operative pain (8% versus 15%) (p = 0.001). The number of infectious complications was slightly lower in Group B (3.3%, 2/60, versus 10%, 6/60), (NS). The authors conclude that harvesting of the saphenous vein by videosurgery reduces postoperative pain and gives a more aesthetic result but with a slightly longer operative time at the beginning of the experience.